Checkr Class Action Lawsuit - Why No One Files It?
Checkr's mistakes impact thousands of people across the United States, from Uber drivers to warehouse workers and forklift operators. With so many consumers affected by the same background check agency, filing or joining a class action lawsuit against Checkr seems like the logical step. But why isn't there an ongoing class action lawsuit? And why no one files it?
The answer is simple - it takes more time and offers fewer benefits for consumers. When you file an individual FCRA claim against Checkr, you and your attorney can clearly outline the specific damages you suffered due to Checkr’s mistakes. This allows for a fair and accurate resolution based on your unique situation. In contrast, a class action lawsuit groups all affected consumers together, approximating damages rather than addressing each person’s individual losses. This can result in lower compensation and a longer legal process, making individual lawsuits a more effective and beneficial option for those impacted by Checkr’s reporting errors.
A class action lawsuit against Checkr would also take significantly longer than an individual case. An experienced attorney can settle an individual claim against Checkr within a month or two, whereas a class action lawsuit could take up to three years. This is unacceptable for consumers who have lost their jobs and cannot secure new income until their Checkr reports are corrected. In such urgent situations, waiting for a class action lawsuit is simply not an option.
Why a Checkr Class Action Lawsuit Won’t Work?
Most Fair Credit Reporting Act cases against Checkr are filed under 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b) and 15 U.S.C. 1681i. These lawsuits are typically pursued individually when Checkr either provides inaccurate information on a consumer’s background report or fails to correct an error after a dispute.
While Checkr’s mistakes often impact multiple consumers simultaneously, identifying exactly whose reports contained errors can be challenging. This complexity makes organizing a class action lawsuit difficult. Additionally, a class action would likely result in a standard payout for all affected individuals, regardless of the severity of their losses. This approach may not be fair, as the impact of Checkr’s errors can vary significantly. Some consumers may have only lost a few hours of work, while others may have been left without income for months. A one-size-fits-all settlement would fail to adequately compensate those who experienced the most severe financial and professional hardships, making individual lawsuits a more effective legal solution.
Checkr Class Action Lawsuit: When Is It Applicable?
Although individual lawsuits are typically used to resolve background check errors, there are certain circumstances where a class action lawsuit against Checkr may be possible.
For example, in the case of a data breach, a class action lawsuit against Checkr would be far more viable. If consumer data were leaked online, an investigation could determine what specific information was compromised and how many individuals were affected. In such situations, Checkr would likely be held accountable and required to compensate consumers for exposing their sensitive data. Unlike individual background check errors, where damages vary significantly from person to person, a data breach affects all impacted individuals in a more uniform way. This makes a class action settlement more appropriate, as an equally divided payout would fairly compensate all consumers whose private information was compromised due to Checkr’s negligence.
Checkr Lawsuit: What’s the Best Solution for Consumers?
An individual lawsuit against Checkr is the best solution for consumers who have suffered due to inaccurate background reporting. When Checkr provides incorrect information on a background check, it can have serious consequences, including lost job opportunities, financial hardship, and damage to a person’s reputation. An individual lawsuit allows for a precise assessment of damages, ensuring that each case is handled separately. Unlike a class action lawsuit, which provides a standard settlement for all affected individuals, an individual lawsuit increases the chances of a fair resolution that accurately reflects the extent of financial and professional harm suffered by each consumer.
It's also important to note that the FCRA Law allows consumers to hire an attorney and file a lawsuit against Checkr without paying any upfront legal fees. Forcing a consumer to bear the cost of litigation for Checkr's mistakes would be both unfair and irrational - especially when the error may have just cost them a job opportunity. Instead, all legal fees will be covered by Checkr at the resolution of the case, in addition to the compensation owed to the consumer. This ensures that affected individuals have access to justice without the burden of legal expenses.
The best solution for consumers who lost employment due to Checkr’s mistakes is an individual FCRA lawsuit, as it provides a prompt resolution and ensures comprehensive compensation.
If you have been affected by Checkr’s inaccurate reporting, contact us for a free case review. We will assess your situation and determine the best litigation strategy for you!
Read More In Our Blog
